As many of you know, I prefer large displays on my computers. I’m in my element with a 27-inch iMac, but Mac notebooks are far more limiting for all sorts of practical reasons. Up until 2011, Apple offered the MacBook Pro in a 17-inch version; I got mine the previous year, and the year-to-year improvements were minor.<\/p>\n
I’m still using it.<\/p>\n
Now there are sensible reasons for me to hang onto it. One is that I was battered and bruised by the 2007 recession, which hasn’t ended to this day for some people. I acquired\u00a0the computer as a trade-out for advertising on The Tech Night Owl LIVE, so there was no out-of-pocket expense, and I picked up some cash selling my old notebook.<\/p>\n
Such is business.<\/p>\n
Aside from the cost of a new computer, there’s another reason to keep what I have, and that’s the display size. When Apple went to a Retina display in 2012, the screens topped out at 15 inches. No doubt the cost of the high resolution displays was one key factor. Another the fact that the larger MacBook Pro was not a terribly good seller, so why not just kill it off?<\/p>\n
Even if I was willing to make\u00a0the sacrifice, and there is an advantage to saving a few pounds when lugging one of those things in a case across an airport terminal, I’m content with what I have. But I had to make modifications to keep it going, and get decent performance.<\/p>\n
One thing that always bothered me with older Apple’s notebooks was the glacial drive performance. Using a tiny hard drive had its shortcomings, and that hurt even if those machines otherwise had sufficient processing power. So when I had a chance to review of 500GB SSD from Other World Computing, I jumped at the opportunity.<\/p>\n
As you know, Apple has since switched entirely to SSDs for Mac portables. It made a world of a difference.<\/p>\n
But Apple really didn’t want you, even then, to upgrade those machines. It wasn’t just the choice to seal the case with tiny pentalobe screws. It’s not that you can’t find the screwdrivers, and some SSD vendors supply them for you for no additional charge. But you have to be real careful during the disassembly process. They’re easy to lose, as I discovered the first time I tried. But OWC took pity on me and sent me a few replacements. I should have put them in a cup; or use an ash tray if you have one around.<\/p>\n
The installation\u00a0process\u00a0of the new drive\u00a0took maybe 15 or 20 minutes. I didn’t run the stopwatch, but it was no big deal to remove the case,. extract the drive, and plugin the replacement. I received\u00a0an external case for the MacBook Pro’s original hard drive. It made it easy to restore my stuff when the time came.<\/p>\n
I’ll be brief: The MacBook Pro is much faster, since the drive-based slowdowns are\u00a0history. I later doubled RAM to 8GB, but the performance improvement was marginal. As I reported earlier this month, my efforts to install macOS Sierra were curiously troublesome. At first the installer displayed a message that I needed to update Apple’s server software first, even though I wasn’t running OS X Server. Installing via the Internet Recovery feature worked fine, and performance is still quite good.<\/p>\n
Over the holidays, my son spent a couple of weeks here on a visit from his apartment in Madrid. He traveled light, meaning his 13-inch MacBook Air, circa 2015, stayed home. So he adopted my notebook, and we both realized the battery was on its last legs. It would usually crap out after two or three hours, and the MagSafe adaptor no longer displayed a full charge indicator. After nearly seven years, even with light use, it was time to make what I hope will be the last change or fix to this device. When I do sell it \u2014 and maybe that’ll happen late this year if all goes well \u2014 I’d like to command the best price.<\/p>\n
So I got ahold of OWC again to see what they were offering. While batteries for those older MacBook Pros are readily available \u2014 quite unlike some newer models where replacing anything may be difficult or impossible \u2014 I was urged to be careful by a few friendly power users. Some of the reviews at Amazon were also discouraging, as the really cheap batteries may not deliver performance that’s comparable to Apple’s original equipment spec of 8-9 hours.<\/p>\n